WebRobinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997)..... 16-17 Runkle v. United States, 122 U.S. 543 (1887)..... 15 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES United States v. Adams, 66 M.J. 255 (C ... United States v. Robinson, 33 C.M.R. 206 (C.M.A. 1963)..... 17 United States v. Sargent ... WebSep 2, 2024 · Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997), Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., 420 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2005)). One court indicated that a plaintiff may state a claim for retaliation even if she is no longer employed by the defendant company “if, for example, the company ‘blacklists’ the former employee.” Rivas v.
ROBINSON v. SHELL OIL CO. , 519 U.S. 337 (1997) - Findlaw
WebAug 20, 2004 · Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (1997). The plain meaning of the language in section 5757 (a) suggests that professional credentials would include only those items that are required for an individual to be licensed or otherwise certified to practice a … WebRobinson v. Shell Oil Co., 951376. Document Cited authorities ... Parties: Charles T. ROBINSON, Sr., Petitioner, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY: Docket Number: 951376: Decision Date: 18 February 1997: 519 U.S. 337 117 S.Ct. 843 136 L.Ed.2d 808 Charles T. ROBINSON, Sr., Petitioner, ... Decided Feb. 18, 1997. Syllabus * After he was fired by respondent ... rec barn
Analyses of Robinson v. Shell Oil Co, 519 U.S. 337
WebEmergency Med., 428 F.3d 408, 423 (2d Cir.2005) (quoting Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 341 1997)( ). “[I]f an attempt to discern the plain meaning fails because the statute is ambiguous,” Green v. City of New York,465 F.3d 65, 78 (2d Cir.2006), the court will “resort to WebAtl. Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United States, 286 U.S. 427, 434 (1932); see also Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 337 (1997) (explaining that a “term may have a plain meaning in the context of a particular section,” and this does not mean “that it has the same meaning in all other sections and in other contexts”). It is true WebShell Oil Company et al, No. 2:2024cv08825 - Document 55 (E.D. La. 2024) Court Description: ORDER AND REASONS - IT IS ORDERED that 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of Shell Oil Company is DENIED. IT IS ORDERED that 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company is GRANTED IN PART, as ... recbc accountant\u0027s report